Tipster 2023/24 - Round 29

Due to the FA Quarter-Finals this weekend, there are only 4 Premier League fixtures.

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford
Luton v Nottm Forest
Fulham v Spurs

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nottm Forest 1-1
Fulham v Spurs 1-3 joker

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Chris Sutton's predictions...

SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-2
Luton v Nott'm Forest 1-1
Fulham v Tottenham 2-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 0-2
Luton v Nottm Forest 1-2
Fulham v Spurs 1-3

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 2-0
Luton v Nottm Forest 3-2
Fulham v Spurs 1-2 joker

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 2-3

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 0-2
Luton v Nottm Forest 3-0
Fulham v Spurs 2-2

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-1

super

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nottm Forest 2-0
Fulham v Spurs 1-3

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 2-1

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 0-1
Luton v Nottm Forest 3-1 joker
Fulham v Spurs 1-2

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

[quote="Super"]

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 1-2
Luton v Nottm Forest 1-1
Fulham v Spurs 1-3

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 2-2

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford. 1=2
Luton v Nottm Forest. 3=1
Fulham v Spurs. 1=2

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1=2

Qld Toffee:

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 1-2
Luton v Nottm Forest 2-1
Fulham v Spurs 0-3

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-3

Cahill17:

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 0-3
Luton v Nottm Forest 1-1
Fulham v Spurs 1-2

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 2-2

Cheers Super

Saturday 16th March
Burnley v Brentford 1-0
Luton v Nottm Forest 2-2
Fulham v Spurs 0-2

Sunday 17th March
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-3 (joker)

Cheers Super

SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this? I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

A very low scoring game from the 4 available fixtures, see's round 29 end in a tie. Congratulstiont to Cahill17 & Sef who both scored 6pts....

Cahill17 - 6
Sefton - 6
Margate Blue - 4
CallMeBubbles - 3
Chris Sutton - 3
Made 4 Gwladys - 3
Rotts 1985 - 1
Da Judge - 0
KoT - 0
Lumper - 0
Qld Toffee - 0
Super - 0
YankThatToffee - 0

OVERALL TABLE
1 - Cahill17 - 286
2 - Chris Sutton - 277
3 - Lumper - 274
4 - Made 4 Gwladys - 271
5 - Super - 269
6 - CallMeBubbles - 267
7 - Qld Toffee - 267
8 - Rotts 1985 - 254
9 - KoT - 253
10 - Da Judge - 248
11 - Margate Blue - 214
12 - YankThatToffee - 212
13 - Sefton - 196

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Or, just don't award any points. It might be a bit controversial if a contender in week 38 got double joker points for a default 1-1 draw that they forgot to predict. That would go to CAS for adjudication, I think. Possibly even the Supreme Court. Would make this season's PL points deduction mess look trivial in comparison.

Do we need an Independent Tipster Regulator?

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Or, just don't award any points. It might be a bit controversial if a contender in week 38 got double joker points for a default 1-1 draw that they forgot to predict. That would go to CAS for adjudication, I think. Possibly even the Supreme Court. Would make this season's PL points deduction mess look trivial in comparison.

Do we need an Independent Tipster Regulator?

Isn't da Judge the beak of the whole Board ???

I propose a fine in line with what the Premier League would do ... so roll a dice & pick a card from a deck of cards & add the numbers together... then deduct that amount of points from Lumper for being so negligent... and no appeals to be heard until 5 weeks after tipster ends... just to keep us all in suspense like..... seems totally fair to me

My own fault for not checking. I’m sure I had i down for a 1 all as well .

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Or, just don't award any points. It might be a bit controversial if a contender in week 38 got double joker points for a default 1-1 draw that they forgot to predict. That would go to CAS for adjudication, I think. Possibly even the Supreme Court. Would make this season's PL points deduction mess look trivial in comparison.

Do we need an Independent Tipster Regulator?

Isn't da Judge the beak of the whole Board ???

I propose a fine in line with what the Premier League would do ... so roll a dice & pick a card from a deck of cards & add the numbers together... then deduct that amount of points from Lumper for being so negligent... and no appeals to be heard until 5 weeks after tipster ends... just to keep us all in suspense like..... seems totally fair to me

Made 4 Gwladys exposing himself to be a massive kopite. Only a supporter of the red shite would propose such a draconian sporting sanction. You and Dicky Champers can do one. #sly6corruption

Lumper wrote:

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Or, just don't award any points. It might be a bit controversial if a contender in week 38 got double joker points for a default 1-1 draw that they forgot to predict. That would go to CAS for adjudication, I think. Possibly even the Supreme Court. Would make this season's PL points deduction mess look trivial in comparison.

Do we need an Independent Tipster Regulator?

Isn't da Judge the beak of the whole Board ???

I propose a fine in line with what the Premier League would do ... so roll a dice & pick a card from a deck of cards & add the numbers together... then deduct that amount of points from Lumper for being so negligent... and no appeals to be heard until 5 weeks after tipster ends... just to keep us all in suspense like..... seems totally fair to me

Made 4 Gwladys exposing himself to be a massive kopite. Only a supporter of the red shite would propose such a draconian sporting sanction. You and Dicky Champers can do one. #sly6corruption

I've Googled Dicky Champers, didn't find anything.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Rotterdam 1985 wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Super wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Lumper wrote:SATURDAY, 16 MARCH
Burnley v Brentford 1-1
Luton v Nott'm Forest  joker
Fulham v Tottenham 1-2

SUNDAY, 17 MARCH
West Ham v Aston Villa 1-2

Uhhh, Lumper, your Joker was blank....

What to do about this?  I wouldn't have seen this on Saturday, because when Lumper would have posted his predictions I was in the pub, having a few beers before the Peterborough Utd v Portsmouth game.

Looking at the summary of results, Lumper had 0 points, so the Joker didn't matter. It was a rather brutal round for most of us.

I propose an amendment to Rule 25.3(b)(ii) of the Laws of Tipster:

"In such situations where a contestant submits an entry but misses a game for whatever reason, we try to get Super out from the pub to adjudicate. But if he's already on stage doing Karaoke, or outside fighting someone who looked at him in a funny way, then it defaults to a 1-1 draw."

Or, just don't award any points. It might be a bit controversial if a contender in week 38 got double joker points for a default 1-1 draw that they forgot to predict. That would go to CAS for adjudication, I think. Possibly even the Supreme Court. Would make this season's PL points deduction mess look trivial in comparison.

Do we need an Independent Tipster Regulator?

Isn't da Judge the beak of the whole Board ???

I propose a fine in line with what the Premier League would do ... so roll a dice & pick a card from a deck of cards & add the numbers together... then deduct that amount of points from Lumper for being so negligent... and no appeals to be heard until 5 weeks after tipster ends... just to keep us all in suspense like..... seems totally fair to me

Made 4 Gwladys exposing himself to be a massive kopite. Only a supporter of the red shite would propose such a draconian sporting sanction. You and Dicky Champers can do one. #sly6corruption

I've Googled Dicky Champers, didn't find anything.

I seen someone on Twitter call Richard Masters that. The kids thinks it’s cool, innit. I don’t know why cause I’m old.