Everton 2 Hull 1 (Barry, Pienaar)

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:            

minus FIVE ...

love it ..... tactics in play

Uwist61 wrote:

Judgement in the Matter
of

Dixie "Swagman" Land

vs

606 Evertonians Match Thread Management Committee

Circumstances

The allegation which has been made centres around the insensitive action taken by Mr Dixieland to "grab" the thread following the recent defeat of the Mighty Blues by the Richer Blues of Manchester. The accusation of insensitivity arises because of the short time between the result and the period of doom, gloom and sack 'em all mentality that inevitably results on the board.

Mr Dixieland makes the case and it is accepted that the thread was open and that his post for the thread was after the referee's whistle, and therefore free to request the thread.

However knowing the defendant and his ability with technology, I am not persuaded that the time taken to create a cartoon likeness in a fancy dress costume posing as a thief could have been created in the short time between the whistle and the post. This does give credence to the potential explanation that Mr Dixieland had some mischievous forethought in looking at the opportunity and the potential stream of fixtures to realise that prompt action could over time bring him some form of popular acclaim - and therefore to act so propitiously whilst others were still mulling, is I believe enough grounds to render the accused guilty.

Now as to what we find him guilty of? (Who says the law is an ass?) Well technically there could be no theft. It is true that Dixie is who Dixie is.... he just looks like that. Which leaves the crass insensitivity.... yep that is what we will use.

Guilty fined -2 points and a concurrent term of sensitivity training ideally in an educational environment. You will also be expected to use the phrase "ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you" at least twice a day - I will accept your honourable word that you have done so.

JUDGEMENT ENDS

sefton wrote:

Uwist61 wrote:

Judgement in the Matter
of

Dixie "Swagman" Land

vs

606 Evertonians Match Thread Management Committee

Circumstances

The allegation which has been made centres around the insensitive action taken by Mr Dixieland to "grab" the thread following the recent defeat of the Mighty Blues by the Richer Blues of Manchester. The accusation of insensitivity arises because of the short time between the result and the period of doom, gloom and sack 'em all mentality that inevitably results on the board.

Mr Dixieland makes the case and it is accepted that the thread was open and that his post for the thread was after the referee's whistle, and therefore free to request the thread.

However knowing the defendant and his ability with technology, I am not persuaded that the time taken to create a cartoon likeness in a fancy dress costume posing as a thief could have been created in the short time between the whistle and the post. This does give credence to the potential explanation that Mr Dixieland had some mischievous forethought in looking at the opportunity and the potential stream of fixtures to realise that prompt action could over time bring him some form of popular acclaim - and therefore to act so propitiously whilst others were still mulling, is I believe enough grounds to render the accused guilty.

Now as to what we find him guilty of? (Who says the law is an ass?) Well technically there could be no theft. It is true that Dixie is who Dixie is.... he just looks like that. Which leaves the crass insensitivity.... yep that is what we will use.

Guilty fined -2 points and a concurrent term of sensitivity training ideally in an educational environment. You will also be expected to use the phrase "ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you" at least twice a day - I will accept your honourable word that you have done so.

JUDGEMENT ENDS

This was premeditated your Honour,with intent to break into M4G'S dark room and steel the thread.
to fine him only -2 points is laughable, he's got off with it whistling Dixie.

Uwist61 wrote:

Judgement in the Matter
of

Dixie "Swagman" Land

vs

606 Evertonians Match Thread Management Committee

Circumstances

The allegation which has been made centres around the insensitive action taken by Mr Dixieland to "grab" the thread following the recent defeat of the Mighty Blues by the Richer Blues of Manchester. The accusation of insensitivity arises because of the short time between the result and the period of doom, gloom and sack 'em all mentality that inevitably results on the board.

Mr Dixieland makes the case and it is accepted that the thread was open and that his post for the thread was after the referee's whistle, and therefore free to request the thread.

However knowing the defendant and his ability with technology, I am not persuaded that the time taken to create a cartoon likeness in a fancy dress costume posing as a thief could have been created in the short time between the whistle and the post. This does give credence to the potential explanation that Mr Dixieland had some mischievous forethought in looking at the opportunity and the potential stream of fixtures to realise that prompt action could over time bring him some form of popular acclaim - and therefore to act so propitiously whilst others were still mulling, is I believe enough grounds to render the accused guilty.

Now as to what we find him guilty of? (Who says the law is an ass?) Well technically there could be no theft. It is true that Dixie is who Dixie is.... he just looks like that. Which leaves the crass insensitivity.... yep that is what we will use.

Guilty fined -2 points and a concurrent term of sensitivity training ideally in an educational environment. You will also be expected to use the phrase "ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you" at least twice a day - I will accept your honourable word that you have done so.

JUDGEMENT ENDS

Dixie Land wrote:

Uwist61 wrote:

Judgement in the Matter
of

Dixie "Swagman" Land

vs

606 Evertonians Match Thread Management Committee

Circumstances

The allegation which has been made centres around the insensitive action taken by Mr Dixieland to "grab" the thread following the recent defeat of the Mighty Blues by the Richer Blues of Manchester. The accusation of insensitivity arises because of the short time between the result and the period of doom, gloom and sack 'em all mentality that inevitably results on the board.

Mr Dixieland makes the case and it is accepted that the thread was open and that his post for the thread was after the referee's whistle, and therefore free to request the thread.

However knowing the defendant and his ability with technology, I am not persuaded that the time taken to create a cartoon likeness in a fancy dress costume posing as a thief could have been created in the short time between the whistle and the post. This does give credence to the potential explanation that Mr Dixieland had some mischievous forethought in looking at the opportunity and the potential stream of fixtures to realise that prompt action could over time bring him some form of popular acclaim - and therefore to act so propitiously whilst others were still mulling, is I believe enough grounds to render the accused guilty.

Now as to what we find him guilty of? (Who says the law is an ass?) Well technically there could be no theft. It is true that Dixie is who Dixie is.... he just looks like that. Which leaves the crass insensitivity.... yep that is what we will use.

Guilty fined -2 points and a concurrent term of sensitivity training ideally in an educational environment. You will also be expected to use the phrase "ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you" at least twice a day - I will accept your honourable word that you have done so.

JUDGEMENT ENDS

Thank you for your lenience and fairness. I take my punishment and promise that there will never be a repeat of this type of behaviour. I now feel ashamed but would like to say that I only stole the thread so that my children can eat. I now see the error of my ways and will look to find God (with Hairy's help).

I was expecting community service or a fine, so I think you have been very fair. I thought your ruling was fair and clear (making no mention of adding the -2 points to any further punishment).

To make up for my actions I promise that Everton will beat Hull next weekend and that Steve Bruce will appear to be uglier than ever.

Ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you.  

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:I presume the -2 fine is ADDITIONAL to the standard -5 theft rule M'Lud ???

Uwist61 wrote:

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:I presume the -2 fine is ADDITIONAL to the standard -5 theft rule M'Lud ???

There was no theft.... But consider any further infraction over coming two seasons to carry a 10 point penalty

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:

Uwist61 wrote:

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:I presume the -2 fine is ADDITIONAL to the standard -5 theft rule M'Lud ???

There was no theft.... But consider any further infraction over coming two seasons to carry a 10 point penalty

Thanks you m'lud ... decision is final

you jammy fucker Dixie... got away with murder there... the law is an ass..

altough I do like the strapline
Ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you

I hope you used it twice every day so far  

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

sefton wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Lets hope we can steel the points against Hull . 

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Dixie Land wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Should I carry on even if we lose to Hull? They may get even better.  

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Should I carry on even if we lose to Hull? They may get even better.  

did you forget something today ?  

Dixie Land wrote:

Made FooFoo Gwladys wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Should I carry on even if we lose to Hull? They may get even better.  

did you forget something today ?  

I don't think so mate.

I just asked my teddy bear and he can't think of anything. You should meet my teddy bear because Ooh its soft and cuddly and meyde fer you.

Dixie Land wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Should I carry on even if we lose to Hull? They may get even better.  

Uwist61 wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Hinchcliffe Corner wrote:This has to be the best start to a match thread ever.

Should I carry on even if we lose to Hull? They may get even better.  

Oh please do... I can read the national press and the public reaction ... and whilst i was right ... i will be even more right the second time....  i treat recidivism particularly harshly...

Mr_Ben wrote:If we don't win Martinez can get to fuck.