5: Johnny Heitinga -"proud Evertonian"

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Dixie Land wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Lol. That was the Nev bid Thor. £1-1.5m

BB wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Lol. That was the Nev bid Thor. £1-1.5m

So how much HAVE Chavs bid for JH ???

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

BB wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Lol. That was the Nev bid Thor. £1-1.5m

So how much HAVE Chavs bid for JH ???

I don't think they have bid for him to be honest.

BB wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Lol. That was the Nev bid Thor. £1-1.5m

So it is £25M for Heitinga then?

Dixie Land wrote:

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

BB wrote:

Dixie Land wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Diamond wrote:rumours chelsea are in for him??

£1M - which is really just silly.

I thought the £1 million was the bid from Spuds for Nev. If it is the Chavski offer for Johnny then they are having a laugh.

Lol. That was the Nev bid Thor. £1-1.5m

So how much HAVE Chavs bid for JH ???

I don't think they have bid for him to be honest.

Thank fuck for that.. I'm getting old tonight

Decent game today I thought... apart from one powder puff tackle that will make him cringe tonight when he watches the game...

Worked well on the whole with Dizzy

Good enough to keep Jags on the bench ??? ... I say yes (for now)

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:Decent game today I thought... apart from one powder puff tackle that will make him cringe tonight when he watches the game...

Worked well on the whole with Dizzy

Good enough to keep Jags on the bench ??? ... I say yes (for now)

I think so as well. However, it's very clear he's not the "hard-man" we thought he was. That tackle that lead to the Blackpool 2-3 goal (I think it was that goal) was like watching an 8-year old girl playing on the school ground.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:Decent game today I thought... apart from one powder puff tackle that will make him cringe tonight when he watches the game...

Worked well on the whole with Dizzy

Good enough to keep Jags on the bench ??? ... I say yes (for now)

I think so as well. However, it's very clear he's not the "hard-man" we thought he was. That tackle that lead to the Blackpool 2-3 goal (I think it was that goal) was like watching an 8-year old girl playing on the school ground.

That's the powder puff tackle I referred to Thor... it's on MOTD highlights as well ... for Hard Johnnie

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

Made 4 Gwladys wrote:Decent game today I thought... apart from one powder puff tackle that will make him cringe tonight when he watches the game...

Worked well on the whole with Dizzy

Good enough to keep Jags on the bench ??? ... I say yes (for now)

I think so as well. However, it's very clear he's not the "hard-man" we thought he was. That tackle that lead to the Blackpool 2-3 goal (I think it was that goal) was like watching an 8-year old girl playing on the school ground.

That's the powder puff tackle I referred to Thor... it's on MOTD highlights as well ... for Hard Johnnie

Maybe he thought the B'pool player was going to go over the top? That's exactly how he was hurt in the Villa away game at the end of last year.

There's a difference between going in for a challenge because you're a nutter, and going in for a challenge when you're not stupid. 50 / 50's often result in bad injuries, so for me it's not a problem. The problem for me was the rediculously naive header by Coleman, and that's what cost us the goal, just like Rodwells silly back pass to Distin cost us Europe. It's not the defenders fault really. You can't win every tackle, and some tackles are best avoided, in order to play again.

BB wrote:There's a difference between going in for a challenge because you're a nutter, and going in for a challenge when you're not stupid. 50 / 50's often result in bad injuries, so for me it's not a problem. The problem for me was the rediculously naive header by Coleman, and that's what cost us the goal, just like Rodwells silly back pass to Distin cost us Europe. It's not the defenders fault really. You can't win every tackle, and some tackles are best avoided, in order to play again.

I thought he was trying not to give away a foul in that location, right about where Adam likes to hit them from. Still a pussy tackle though for a hard man.

mindyerho? wrote:

BB wrote:There's a difference between going in for a challenge because you're a nutter, and going in for a challenge when you're not stupid. 50 / 50's often result in bad injuries, so for me it's not a problem. The problem for me was the rediculously naive header by Coleman, and that's what cost us the goal, just like Rodwells silly back pass to Distin cost us Europe. It's not the defenders fault really. You can't win every tackle, and some tackles are best avoided, in order to play again.

I thought he was trying not to give away a foul in that location, right about where Adam likes to hit them from. Still a pussy tackle though for a hard man.

This hard man???

Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

BB wrote:Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

1.80m = 5.91 ft = 5ft 11 inches.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

BB wrote:Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

1.80m = 5.91 ft = 5ft 11 inches.

I'd go with 5' 9"

Yankthattoffee wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

BB wrote:Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

1.80m = 5.91 ft = 5ft 11 inches.

I'd go with 5' 9"

Fucking soft shortarsed Dutch poof

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

BB wrote:Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

1.80m = 5.91 ft = 5ft 11 inches.

1.8 metres = 5.90551181 feet

Where do you get your extra 2 inches from? I'll bet you're huge in the shower lol.

BB wrote:

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:

BB wrote:Who said anything about him being a hard man?

He's not exactly King Kong is he?

Height: 1.80m or 5ft 9
Weight: 72 kg or 11st 3

Now considering it's a none contact sport, i.e, even if he was into mixed martial arts, he can't head butt, punch, or strangle someone, he's hardly going to be throwing his weight around on a football field.

1.80m = 5.91 ft = 5ft 11 inches.

1.8 metres = 5.90551181 feet

Where do you get your extra 2 inches from? I'll bet you're huge in the shower lol.

There are 12 inches in a foot. 11/12 = 0.9167 ft. Hence, 1.80m = 5'-11", which is the same as 5.91ft.

Or what do you mean by your math?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heitinga

When someone says 5ft 9, in the States that means 5 foot 9 inches, not 5 feet and 9/10th of a foot.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heitinga

When someone says 5ft 9, in the States that means 5 foot 9 inches, not 5 feet and 9/10th of a foot.

Knight of Thorgothshire wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heitinga

When someone says 5ft 9, in the States that means 5 foot 9 inches, not 5 feet and 9/10th of a foot.

Yes, you are quite correct. Fricking Google.

Actually that makes him even weaker than I thought lol.

DM playing him, to put him the transfer shop window?

i thought it was ace the way he walked into cashley cole just before his missed penalty. well put him off

johnny 5, the enforcer